
Did Mary experience pain in childbirth?
Share
Some of our greatest joys emerge from our deepest sorrows. God's work in our lives often defies natural expectations.
As a Protestant, I've sometimes been a little "blind" to Mary's role in the Gospels, indeed in all of Scripture. I think some of this comes from some of the inherent anti-Catholic bias I was raised with. I just never really considered digging deeper into her significance in everything beyond the Nativity narrative.
Over the years, though, I've learned that it's best not to make too many assumptions about what other Christians believe. I also can't let my biases get in the way of what the Scriptures actually say. I've often found that my assumptions about other Christian teachings were exactly that - assumptions.
So, recently, I did a deep-dive into the role of Mary in Jesus' birth and her role in fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy. This isn't about ancient extra-biblical traditions, it's about what the full-testimony of the Scriptures--the combined witness of the Old and New Testaments--tells us about this woman who once remarked that all generations would call her "blessed" (Luke 1:48).
In the full biblical narrative of Mary, mother of Jesus, we encounter a profound paradox that speaks to these very questions—a story where childbirth without pain (yes, I said without pain!) leads to heartache beyond measure, and where loss transforms into the birth of something new.
Isaiah 66:7-9 - The Prophetic Vision
"Before she was in labor she gave birth; before her pain came upon her she delivered a son. Who has heard such a thing? Who has seen such things? Shall a land be born in one day? Shall a nation be brought forth in one moment? For as soon as Zion was in labor she brought forth her children. Shall I bring to the point of birth and not cause to bring forth?" says the LORD; "shall I, who cause to bring forth, shut the womb?" says your God." (Isa 66:7-9)
The Hebrew text of Isaiah 66:7 presents us with a striking prophetic inversion that challenges our understanding of natural order. The phrase טֶרֶם תָּחִיל יָלָדָה (terem tachil yaladah) literally translates as "before she labored, she gave birth." The verb תָּחִיל (tachil) derives from the root חול (chul), specifically denoting the writhing pain of childbirth. Here Isaiah portrays a birth preceding the very labor pains that should produce it—a complete reversal of natural processes.
This prophetic image points toward the virgin birth of Christ, suggesting a delivery unbound by the consequences announced in Genesis 3:16, where God tells Eve, "I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children." The Hebrew term עִצְּבוֹנֵךְ (itstsevonek, "your pain") establishes childbirth pain as part of fallen creation's reality.
In this seemingly impossible birth—one without preceding pain—we see God's first act in reversing creation's curse. The natural impossibility points to a supernatural reality: in Christ's birth, new creation begins to break through the constraints of the fallen world. The painless birth serves as the inaugural movement of God's plan to make all things new (Rev. 21:5)
What makes this passage particularly profound is its paradoxical nature. The birth described defies all human experience, yet it unfolds within human history. In this contradiction, we find hope—God works not by abandoning creation but by transforming it from within, starting with the very process of human birth itself.
He begins redemption by reversing the curse on woman in the garden.
But that didn't mean Mary never experienced birth pangs.
Mary at the Cross - John 19:25-27
"But standing by the cross of Jesus were his mother and his mother's sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene. When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, 'Woman, behold, your son!' Then he said to the disciple, 'Behold, your mother!' And from that hour the disciple took her to his own home." (John 19:25-27)
While Mary may have been spared the physical pain of childbirth, she was not excluded from suffering entirely. In fact, the sorrow she must've experienced in front of the cross has to be the deepest kind of motherly suffering imaginable.
The Greek term παρειστήκεισαν (pareistēkeisan, "were standing") in John 19:25 portrays a posture of steadfast endurance. Mary stood—she did not collapse, flee, or hide—as her son suffered an excruciating death. Here unfolds the fulfillment of Simeon's prophecy that "a sword will pierce through your own soul also" (Luke 2:35).
When Jesus addresses Mary as γύναι (gynai, "woman"), he's not being disrespectful. Quite the contrary. What's especially remarkable is that this isn't even a common term of "honorable" address as is sometimes claimed. The real significance of Jesus calling Mary "woman" connects everything back to Eden, to the woman, who is later named Eve.
This form of address connects Mary to the primeval narrative of creation and fall. She stands at the cross as the counterpoint to Eve, present at the very moment when the serpent's head is being crushed through the bruising of her son's heel (Gen 3:15).
Here at Golgotha, Mary experiences the true "birth pangs" that Isaiah's prophecy had seemingly exempted her from—not physical labor, but soul-piercing anguish as she participates in redemption's cost.
The physical painlessness of Jesus' birth finds its counterbalance in the spiritual torment of his death. What began in miraculous joy concludes in miraculous sorrow, yet both serve as bookends to the incarnation.
In this crucifixion scene, we witness the creation of a new family. Jesus' words, "Woman, behold your son" and "Behold your mother," establish relationships not based on blood but on shared devotion to Christ. This represents the embryonic form of the church itself—a community born from Christ's suffering, united not by natural birth but by supernatural rebirth.
Revelation 12:1-5 - The Cosmic Birth
"And a great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars. She was pregnant and was crying out in birth pains and the agony of giving birth... She gave birth to a male child, one who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron..." (Rev 12:1-2, 5)
Revelation 12 elevates Mary's experience to cosmic proportions. The Greek term ὠδίνουσα (ōdinousa, "suffering birth pains") from ὠδίν (ōdin, "birth pang") explicitly mentions what Isaiah's prophecy declared absent. This apparent contradiction reveals a profound theological truth: the woman of Revelation 12 represents both Mary individually and the believing community collectively.
The birth pangs in Revelation 12 encompass all the suffering that brings forth God's redemptive purposes—Mary's anguish at the cross, the apostles' persecution, and the church's ongoing tribulations. These collective pains produce the extension of Christ's reign throughout history.
The dragon's opposition to the woman and her child dramatizes the cosmic significance of Mary's role. Her experience becomes the paradigm for all believers who face opposition while bearing Christ to the world. Just as she physically carried Jesus, we spiritually carry his presence into a hostile world.
The child "caught up to God and to his throne" represents both Christ's ascension and the security of all who are "hidden with Christ in God" (Col 3:3). The woman's flight into the wilderness parallels Mary and Joseph's escape to Egypt but expands to include the church's journey through history—protected by God yet not exempt from suffering.
John 2:1-11 - "Woman" at Cana
"On the third day there was a wedding at Cana in Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was there... When the wine ran out, the mother of Jesus said to him, 'They have no wine.' And Jesus said to her, 'Woman, what does this have to do with me? My hour has not yet come.'" (John 2:1, 3-4)
The wedding at Cana occurs "on the third day" (τῇ ἡμέρᾳ τῇ τρίτῃ), a detail that positions this event within John's creation-week structure. The Gospel begins with "In the beginning" (Ἐν ἀρχῇ), deliberately echoing Genesis 1:1. This wedding thus corresponds symbolically to the sixth day of creation—when humanity was formed and marriage instituted.
We could go through John's Gospel and see each of the six days of creation (the seventh comes later, when Christ becomes our Sabbath) paralleled by each of the events that occur in the first several chapters. That's a study for another time, maybe I'll post about it later, but suffice it to say that the Wedding at Cana fits squarely in this six-days-of-creation structure.
Jesus' addressing of Mary as γύναι ("woman") points both backward and forward. Backwards, as we've seen, to the "woman" in Genesis 2. Forward, it creates a verbal bridge to the cross, where he will use the same term. This linguistic connection binds together the beginning of his signs and the culmination of his work. At Cana, the transformation of water into wine prefigures how his shed blood will transform death into life--where water and blood flow from the spear-wound in Jesus' side.
Mary's simple statement, "They have no wine," demonstrates her perception of lack and her confidence in her son's ability to address it. Her subsequent instruction to the servants—"Do whatever he tells you" (John 2:5)—stands as her only recorded directive in Scripture, encapsulating the essence of discipleship: complete obedience to Christ.
Jesus' reference to his "hour" (ὥρα) points ahead to his passion—the ultimate "birth" of new creation. Mary's role at Cana demonstrates how human need, presented to Christ in faith, becomes the occasion for divine glory to be revealed. The abundance of wine (approximately 120-180 gallons) signifies the overflowing nature of grace that Christ's "hour" will ultimately provide.
Theological Synthesis and Application
The interconnected biblical narratives of Mary weave together a several events that would otherwise seem disjointed. In truth, that's a part of what John's doing in his Gospel. The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) are more interested in the historic chronology of Jesus' life, but John's concern is the theological link of all these events. Beginning with "in the beginning" also indicates that this link also expands both testaments, the entire revelation of God. Here, we're shown a profound pattern in God's redemptive plan.
Each story thread—whether it is Isaiah's prophecy, her enduring presence at the cross, the cosmic vision in Revelation, or the wedding at Cana—connects to the others in a way that speaks to the deeper realities of creation and redemption. What emerges is a seamless narrative, one that binds together themes of painless birth and profound suffering, loss and renewal, separation and reunion, all working together within the divine scheme of new creation.
Mary's lack of birth pain is linked to her sorrow at the cross where new creation is born. In this way, womanhood itself finds a unique connection to Jesus' death and resurrection. The very curse upon Eve becomes enveloped in the woman's (Mary's) sorrow at the foot of the cross. This doesn't mean that Mary's suffering atones for our sin, it doesn't mean she's a part of the all-availing sacrifice directly, but it means she does participate in the sorrow of the cross in a way that accords with Jesus' exhortation to all of us: take up your cross, and follow me (Matt 16:24-26).
It's ultimately there, where the womb is linked to the tomb, that we learn of the re-birth of all of creation, the birth of the church, and the new-birth we all participate in as we're buried with Christ and raised with him again.
In Jesus' name,
Judah